The Hidden Dangers of CFDs Trading You Need to Know

Contract for difference (CFD) trading has exploded in popularity over the last decade. With the promise of quick profits, thrilling action, and low barriers to entry, it’s no wonder why so many are drawn to CFD trading. However, behind the allure lies hidden dangers that every trader must be aware of. In this extensive guide, I’ll uncover the murkiest secrets of CFD trading so you can approach it with full transparency and make informed decisions.

By the end, you’ll have a comprehensive understanding of the downsides and risks involved with CFDs. I’ll also share tips to mitigate the hazards. My goal is not to dissuade you from CFD trading – that decision is ultimately up to you – but rather provide the facts so you know precisely what you’re getting into. So buckle up and get ready to dip into the underbelly of CFD trading. This is going to be one eye-opening ride!

CFDs are agreements between a buyer and a seller to exchange the difference in the value of a financial product between the time the contract opens and closes. CFDs allow you to speculate on the price movement of various assets, such as stocks, forex, commodities, or indices, without having to buy or sell them.

For example, let’s say you want to trade CFDs on Apple stock. You don’t actually own any shares of Apple, but you can speculate on its price movements. If you think Apple’s price will go up, you can buy a CFD contract that pays you the difference between the current price and the higher price at the end of the contract. If you think Apple’s price will go down, you can sell a CFD contract that pays you the difference between the current price and the lower price at the end of the contract.

CFDs may seem attractive because they offer several advantages, such as:

  1. Access to a wide range of markets with low entry costs
  2. Ability to use leverage to magnify your profits
  3. Flexibility to go long or short on any market
  4. No expiry date or delivery of physical goods or securities

However, CFDs trading is not for everyone. It is a complex and risky form of trading that requires a high level of skill, knowledge, and discipline.

CFDs vs Futures vs Stocks vs Options

Feature
CFDs
Futures
Stocks
Options
Contract Type
Derivative
Derivative
Ownership
Derivative
Underlying Asset
Stocks, currencies, indices, commodities
Commodities, currencies, indices
Companies
Stocks (underlying asset)
Ownership
No ownership of underlying asset
No ownership of underlying asset
Ownership of underlying asset
No ownership of underlying asset
Obligation
Obligation to pay/receive difference in opening and closing price
Obligation to buy/sell underlying asset at expiry
No obligation to buy/sell
Right, but not obligation, to buy/sell underlying asset at expiry
Settlement
Cash settlement (difference in price paid in cash)
Physical delivery (or cash settlement)
Cash dividend (potential)
Cash settlement (profit or loss on option)
Leverage
Yes (high leverage possible)
Yes (high leverage possible)
No
Limited leverage
Trading Style
Short-term trading (can be held for any time)
Short-term to medium-term (expires on specific date)
Long-term or short-term
Short-term to medium-term (expires on specific date)
Cost
Spreads (difference between bid/ask price)
Commissions and margin requirements
Commissions
Option premium (cost of buying the option)
Complexity
Relatively complex
Complex
Relatively simple
Moderately complex
Suitability
Experienced traders comfortable with leverage
Experienced traders comfortable with expiry dates
New and experienced investors
Option strategies can be complex but basic options are understandable

Overinflated Leverage

One of the main selling points of CFD trading is the ability to trade on leverage. Instead of paying the full cost of an asset, your broker lends you a portion of it. Essentially, you’re taking out a loan from the brokerage to increase your buying power.

With CFDs, leverage ratios can go as high as 400:1. That means for every $1 you put up, you can control $400 worth of assets. At first glance, this appears to provide enormous profit potential. If your analysis is correct, gains get multiplied quickly. However, just as leverage amplifies wins, it exacerbates losses at an equally rapid pace.

Overinflated Leverage

Let’s walk through an example:

You want to buy $20,000 worth of shares in Company XYZ. The current share price is $50. So you’d need 400 shares which would cost $20,000. However, with a 400:1 leverage ratio, you only need to put up $50 of your own capital. The broker lends you the remaining $19,950 on margin.

Now let’s say the share price rises to $55. Your 400 shares are now worth $22,000, giving you a $2,000 profit. Thanks to 400:1 leverage, your $50 investment yielded a $2,000 return, or 4000% profit. A phenomenal gain!

But the flip side is equally dramatic. If the share price dropped to $45, your 400 shares would now be valued at $18,000. That’s a $2,000 loss on your $50 investment, completely wiping you out.

As you can see, 400:1 leverage cuts both ways. While you can realize outsized gains, even small price moves against you can lead to catastrophic losses in the blink of an eye.

This presents a psychological pitfall too. After enjoying a series of wins with high leverage, many traders become overconfident and reckless. They load up on positions with insufficient risk management. When the tide turns, they get carried out on a stretcher.

Furthermore, some brokers intentionally advertise eye-popping leverage amounts on particular assets just to entice traders. They’re well aware most clients end up blowing out their accounts when markets shift.

The takeaway is not that leverage is inherently bad. When applied prudently, it can be a useful tool to maximize gains. But few beginning traders exhibit the discipline necessary to thrive with 400:1 leverage. Thus for most, lower leverage ratios are recommended, along with proper risk controls. Don’t let the leverage lure lead you into a false sense of security.

Pricing & Conflicts of Interest

Pricing Conflicts Of Interest

Another distinction between CFD trading and traditional shares or futures is less transparency. CFDs are an over-the-counter (OTC) product with pricing set by the broker. This opens the door for potential conflicts of interest.

Unlike exchange-traded instruments, you can’t easily confirm if the price you receive on a CFD trade is fair. Spreads and fees may not be readily apparent. And if pricing seems unfavorable, you have little recourse.

With OTC products, the broker can effectively act as the counterparty on trades. So in practice, the broker profits when clients lose on trades. This misalignment of interests is troubling to say the least.

Moreover, the broker may intentionally widened spreads or slippage during periods of peak volatility to maximize profits. With lack of pricing transparency, clients are none the wiser.

Again, not all brokers take unethical actions like these. But the possibility exists. With CFDs, you ultimately need to trust the brokerage, which may not be prudent if adequate due diligence is lacking.

For these reasons, it’s recommended to start CFD trading only with reputable, well-capitalized brokers. Carefully vet brokers to ensure a regulatory structure for transparency and fairness. Avoid offshore brokers since increased risks come with reduced oversight.

While CFD trading does offer convenience and wide asset selection under one roof, questionable pricing and potential conflicts of interest remain underlying hazards.

Counterparty Risk is Real

Allow me to repeat the critical point from earlier: with CFDs, brokers are effectively the counterparty on all trades. You do not actually own the underlying asset. Your profit and loss comes from the broker based on price changes in the asset.

This means you face counterparty risk with the brokerage. If they suffer solvency issues or go bankrupt, the recoverability of your capital and profits is jeopardized. You become an unsecured creditor in line behind secured creditors in the bankruptcy proceedings.

During the 2008-2009 financial crisis, over a dozen CFD brokers went bust as volatility spiked. Clients were unable to access accounts as brokers experienced liquidity and margin call problems. Many lost a substantial portion or even all of their account value.

And that was during a temporary market dislocation. Imagine the counterparty dangers if we faced a systemic banking crisis. Under such a scenario, even the biggest brokers are not immune to failure.

That’s why it’s imperative to do counterparty due diligence on any prospective CFD broker. Only open an account if their balance sheet and liquidity are rock solid. Diversifying across multiple brokers also reduces counterparty risk since you won’t have all eggs in one basket.

Never forget – a broker’s financial troubles can quickly cascade into your own losses from locked up or reduced capital. With CFDs, your fortunes are tied to the viability of the broker’s business. Ignore counterparty risk at your own peril.

Limited Ownership Rights

There’s an important distinction between owning the actual financial asset versus a derivative contract based on the asset price. With CFDs, you do not have any ownership rights to the underlying security or instrument. This has a few implications:

No voting rights – If the CFD is based on a publicly traded company, you have no ability to participate in shareholder voting matters. The broker owns the actual shares, you simply have price exposure.

No dividends or distributions – Any dividends or distributions from the underlying asset accrue to the broker as legal owner. You have no claims to these cash flows.

Inability to transfer assets – Typical shareholder rights around transferring, gifting, or donating shares do not apply to CFDs since you own no such assets. The CFD contract cannot be moved out of the brokerage account.

Overall lack of control – You rely solely on the broker to honor their contractual obligations. For shares especially, this can feel restricting compared to legal ownership rights.

In essence, you’re taking opportunistic directional bets rather than establishing true economic ownership. This may or may not matter based on personal trading objectives. But it’s worth internalizing the lack of rights that comes with CFD derivatives trading.

Costs Add Up Quickly

Between spreads, commissions, overnight funding charges, and account fees, CFD trading costs can consume a chunk of profits without proper vigilance. Unlike stocks or ETFs, you rarely get to enter and exit CFD trades for free. The following expenses need to be accounted for:

  • Spreads – The difference between the buy and sell price quoted. This bid-ask spread results in an immediate cost each trade.
  • Commissions – Flat fees charged per trade, typically $3 to $10 range. Scalping strategies generate excessive commissions.
  • Overnight financing – For leveraged trades held past market close, an overnight funding fee reflects interest cost on borrowed margin capital. Can really accumulate for long-term directional trades.
  • Inactivity fees – Brokers charge monthly or quarterly fees if account activity or balances fall below minimum thresholds. Yet another drag.
  • Account currency conversion – Trading instruments not denominated in your account’s base currency incur conversion expenses, both on entries and exits.
  • Withdrawal fees – Most brokers charge fees for withdrawing cash from accounts, anywhere from $10 to $50 per occurrence. These really add up for frequent withdrawals.

The typical trader doesn’t properly account for these ancillary CFD trading costs. Those few dollars here and there don’t seem like much individually. But over hundreds of trades, costs expand substantially. Death by a thousand paper cuts is how many brokerages profit.

Make sure to investigate the full fee schedule before initiating any CFD trades. The commissions page should clearly itemize all pertinent expense categories. Don’t gloss over the details, as loose assumptions can lead to gross underestimation of total trading costs.

The Double Whammy of Dividends

For long stock positions, earning dividends provides a nice income stream. But with CFDs, not only do you miss out on dividends, you actually pay for the privilege through amplified financing costs. Allow me to explain.

When a stock held long via CFD goes ex-dividend, two things happen:

The stock price decreases by the dividend amount pre-market, gaping you down.

You must pay an equivalent overnight financing charge to account for the dividend, even though you receive no actual dividend.

This amounts to a double hit – first the price drop decreases your position value, then you pay funding reflecting the dividend as if you were short the stock. Not ideal.

Brokers implement this process because they are the legal owners entitled to dividends. However, as the CFD holder, you experience all the drawbacks and none of the direct benefits.

Now this isn’t so detrimental on low yielding stocks with smaller dividends. But high yield names could rack up substantial financing charges over months and years. It’s a hidden expense easily overlooked until account statements start dwindling faster than expected.

As with most facets of CFD trading, the convenience factor comes with distinct compromises. Account for the heightened financing costs imposed around ex-dividend dates to avoid a rude awakening down the road.

Burdens Short Selling

While CFD brokers market the ease of going short compared to traditional markets, this convenience is not without considerable costs and risks.

The main reason short selling CFDs seems simpler is avoidance of the short stock borrow process. When shorting actual shares, brokers must locate borrowable stock inventory through lending networks. This adds logistical frictions.

With CFDs, brokers sidestep borrow requirements by taking the other side of client shorts. But in turn, you pay higher financing charges for the privilege via elevated overnight funding rates on short trades.

In volatile markets, these short funding rates can spike drastically without notice. What was once a mild financing amount balloons into a major expense. Brokers sometimes intentionally increase short rates to discourage clients from piling on additional short exposure.

You also lose favorable tax treatment on short sale profits per IRS rules. Since no actual shares change hands, CFD short trades do not count as qualified short positions. There goes a nice tax loophole closed to CFD traders.

More worryingly, short squeezes can leave CFD traders handicapped. During a vicious short squeeze, shares may be entirely unobtainable at any price. But CFD brokers can essentially conjure up inventory since they act as counterparty.

However, they impose exorbitant financing rates during short squeezes to account for their own rising borrow fees and risks. With no borrowing alternatives, you get stuck paying through the nose or closing positions at steep losses.

All told, while CFD brokers market effortless short selling, it comes at a hidden premium. Accounting for amplified borrowing costs is crucial when building short positions. Otherwise, you may learn the hard way how quickly financing carry adds up.

Risk Double Whammy

When using CFDs to trade foreign assets, from index funds to commodities, you face currency risk coming and going as an added hazard:

The underlying asset is priced in a foreign currency, causing currency risk as it fluctuates up and down.

Your CFD account is also denominated in a base currency different than the asset’s. More currency risk when converting to your account currency.

This dual currency risk means forex fluctuations into and out of your account’s base currency can multiply overall volatility.

For example, say you want to trade CFDs on Japanese stocks priced in Japanese Yen:

If the Yen strengthens vs. your account’s US Dollar currency, the stock effectively decreases in USD terms even if its static in JPY terms.

Then when you convert any profits back into USD at trade closure, results must be reconverted from JPY to USD, causing further deviation.

Pretty soon, currency fluctuations dominate asset performance. Any gains (or losses) on the actual securities pale in comparison to the forex swings.

With CFDs, you take on currency risk with the asset itself and secondarily with your account’s base currency. It’s a double whammy speculators must be aware of before trading foreign CFD markets.

Vulnerability to Price Gapping

In fast-moving markets, securities can gap up or down sharply between trading sessions due to news events or volatility. This poses a hidden risk for CFD traders.

Because CFDs avoid actual exchange order matching, brokers can reset pricing sharply higher or lower overnight during periods of radical market moves. Normally orderly price changes transform into disruptive price gaps when markets reopen.

For example, if an earnings disaster hits after hours, a stock may plummet 15% literally overnight. This forces CFD brokers to gap their price quotes down by similar amounts to start the next day.

But if you had long positions or open orders at better prices, they are now hugely mismarked based on the next day’s chaotic open. You essentially get whipsawed by the singular broker pricing.

Worse, the broker may intentionally widen bid-ask spreads dramatically upon reopen while keeping prices several percentage points against your favor. This digs you into an immediate unrealized hole.

In conventional markets, radical after hours moves trigger exchange circuit breakers upon reopen to smooth gaps. But no such protection exists in the OTC CFD world. You absorb the full brunt of panic gaps.

The only recourse is setting stop losses religiously so positions automatically close before accumulation of severe drawdowns. But even stops may not trigger until more adverse pricing. Beware thinly traded markets with potential for sharp overnight dislocations.

Vulnerability to One-Sided Liquidity

A core pitfall of CFD trading arises when markets turn illiquid. Brokers can effectively shut off two-sided trading and worsen pricing against your position side.

In chaotic markets, maintaining orderly two-sided trading is extremely difficult. Volatility scares away liquidity providers on one side of the book. This creates a massive imbalance.

The CFD broker ends up offloading risk to clients by allowing trades only in the direction the broker desires. With little competition for your orders, spreads widen massively and price gapping accelerates. The broker has captive clients and squeezes hard.

For example, say a shock event sparks a plunge in oil futures. Market makers disappear on the long side but short sellers pound bids. The CFD broker then only offers short sales on very wide spreads, preventing clients from taking long positions or exiting shorts. A one-sided siege unfolds.

In effect, the counterparty model allows brokers to dump imbalanced risk flows directly onto your books. Beware of getting run over during panic liquidity events or you may find no exits until much lower. Always expect liquidity to favor the broker, not you, when volatility erupts.

Vulnerability to Margin Changes

Unlike futures markets where margin requirements follow clear rules, CFD brokers can raise margin minimums at any time without warning. They don’t want traders with insufficient margin to remain exposed during major selloffs.

When you open a futures position, the initial margin and maintenance margin levels are fixed according to exchange rules. But CFDs feature no such consistency.

For example, oil CFD maintenance margin may start at just 5% of notional value. This allows substantial leverage on your investment capital. However, if an oil crash unfolds, the broker may instantly raise maintenance margins to 15% or higher to cover their risk.

Your once adequately margined position is now grossly under-margined based on new requirements. The broker will either liquidate your position at a massive loss or demand an immediate margin top up to maintain the trade. Neither are palatable options.

In effect, raising margin limits mid-trade is a backdoor way for the brokerage to force your hand while protecting their interests. Don’t expect clear rules around margin changes with CFDs – it’s a case of ready-fire-aim during turmoil.

Vulnerability to “Stop Hunts”

Unscrupulous brokers can also manipulate prices to trigger client stop losses, then reverse direction before exiting their own positions. This stop loss hunting lets them profit while eliminating client orders.

Because CFD brokers enjoy pricing latitude as the market maker, this stop running maneuver is cunningly easy to implement.

For example, if a broker sees long client stops clustered below current price, they briefly whipsaw the market lower to trigger a cascade of stops. Clients are forced out at a loss while the broker covers shorts profitably. The broker then buys back contracts at lower prices after stopping out clients.

Once client stops are cleared, the broker reverts the market higher, booking easy profits on the down and up spike. Meanwhile, clients are left with closed out positions and losses from below true value.

Worse still, after getting stopped out, many traders look to re-enter the same direction after seeing the favorable reversal. The broker then scalps the same clients again who are now chasing stops. A dirty yet ingenious trick.

Because clients have no transparency into the broker’s proprietary book, proving predatory stop hunts is virtually impossible. Only a string of conspicuous transactions points to ulterior motives.

Unfortunately, when your counterparty is also the singular market maker, numerous conflicts arise. Protect stops judiciously and scale in size to avoid being an easy target. And think twice about immediately re-entering after stops trigger.

Beware the Mind Games

Make no mistake, CFD brokers employ armies of risk managers, quant developers, and data scientists explicitly to maximize client losses and improve the house “edge.” Trading CFDs is NOT just like exchanging bets with a friend. You face off against highly sophisticated professionals armed with every informational and technical advantage.

From a game theory perspective, the broker’s incentives are diametrically opposed to yours. Their goal is engineering trading outcomes that maximize fees generated and client losses accrued. Billion dollar enterprises like IG Group and CMC Markets achieve consistent profitability for a reason – and it’s not by creating evenly matched games.

Through refined risk models and order flow analysis, brokers can predict client emotions, pain points, and biases with eerie accuracy. This lets them structure trades in a manner most likely to trigger mistakes – overleveraging, improperly placed stops, going “all in”, etc. They lay mental traps for unwitting traders.

By aggregating client trading data across tens of thousands of accounts in real-time, brokers understand precisely how much “juice” is needed to move prices to optimize outcomes. You’re not just trading against the market but against a puppet master intentionally nudging markets against you.

The game is ingeniously rigged from the start by dangling the false hope of easy profits via leverage. In reality, the broker math dictates overwhelming probability of losses over time as clients succumb to cognitive and emotional pitfalls.

Approach CFD trading knowing the cards are substantially stacked against you. Don’t underestimate the manipulative sophistication of institutional CFD brokers or they’ll quickly pick your pocket. Consistent discipline is key.

Anticipate their push/pull dynamics rather than reacting. And accept the inherent challenges when your counterparty is also the singular market maker. You must beat them at their own game.

A Cautionary Tale

If the litany of dangers and red flags still haven’t swayed you away from CFD trading, let me share one harrowing account from a trading friend that encapsulates the risks.

Years back, he decided to daytrade equity CFDs with 85% leverage after watching some YouTube videos. On paper, everything seemed straightforward – just pick the right stocks, capture a few percentage upside, and bank consistent profits thanks to the power of leverage.

Early trades went remarkably well as the tech bubble kept inflating. He quickly built a $20,000 account into $75,000 and felt like a trading phenom, on top of the world. But it was a classic case of overconfidence bred by beginner’s luck.

When the bubble popped and volatility picked up, he made the fatal mistake of shorting equity CFDs at higher leverage thinking stocks would keep plunging. However, he was fighting against Federal Reserve easing and government interventions aimed at buoying markets.

Not only did he rack up carry costs trying to hold short positions, the broker hunted his stops repeatedly. His account equity got bled out week after week until barely a few thousand dollars remained. In desperation, he doubled down on his shorts hoping for a reversal…only to get margin called and wiped out completely.

Years of savings gone in a matter of months. The broker’s risk management team knew exactly how to play him. Stop hunting and increasing margins forced him into reckless moves to survive. It was a masterful checkmate.

While an extreme example, similar cautionary tales abound in CFD trading. It’s a long con designed to reel you in with early wins before the house ultimately consumes your capital through leverage. Tread carefully.

The Bottom Line

And there you have it – a comprehensive rundown of hidden CFD trading dangers that brokers never talk about. I aimed to illuminate the murkier realities so you can make informed decisions with greater transparency.

Here are some key parting takeaways:

  • Leverage is a double-edged sword that magnifies losses as rapidly as gains
  • Lack of pricing transparency leads to conflicts of interest
  • You face counterparty risk and lack ownership rights to the underlying asset
  • Myriad fees add up quickly to erode profits
  • Short selling incurs major borrowing costs and liquidity risks
  • Forex volatility compounds with dual currency exposure
  • Gapping, skewed liquidity, and manipulated stops are recurring hazards
  • Brokers use data science against you – it’s not an even playing field

I don’t claim CFDs can’t be traded profitably under the right conditions. Some skilled traders do master the product. But major advantages reside overwhelmingly with the broker.

As you can see, CFDs trading is not a simple or easy way to make money. It involves high risks that can result in substantial losses if not managed properly. Therefore, before you start trading CFDs, you should:

  1. Educate yourself about how CFDs work and what are their advantages and disadvantages
  2. Assess your financial situation and risk appetite and set realistic goals and expectations
  3. Choose a reliable and regulated CFD broker that offers competitive prices and services
  4. Develop a trading plan that suits your style and objectives and follow it consistently
  5. Use appropriate risk management techniques and tools to limit your exposure and protect your capital
  6. Keep track of your performance and learn from your mistakes

CFDs trading can be rewarding if done correctly, but it can also be devastating if done recklessly. Remember that CFDs are complex and risky instruments that are not suitable for everyone. Trade with caution and responsibility and never risk more than you can afford to lose.

As the saying goes, “If you sit down at a poker table and don’t see a sucker, you are the sucker.” With CFDs, pitfall upon pitfall awaits unwary speculators lured by slick promotions. Avoid becoming the feast at the CFD shark tank unless you truly understand the risks.

Hopefully this post illuminated the underbelly of CFDs so you can make judicious choices. Despite brokers marketing CFDs as simple trading vehicles, dire hazards lurk beneath the surface for ill-prepared traders. Stay vigilant!

FAQ

Are CFDs a fast way to make money or lose it all?

The answer is: it depends. CFDs can be a powerful tool for experienced and savvy traders who know how to use them properly and responsibly. But they can also be a dangerous trap for inexperienced and reckless traders who don’t know what they are doing or who take unnecessary risks. Before you start trading CFDs, make sure you do your homework, understand the pros and cons, and weigh the potential rewards against the potential risks.

Can CFDs be used for hedging existing investments in other asset classes?

Yes, CFDs can be used to hedge existing investments:

  • Hedging Long Positions: You can open a short CFD position on the same asset to offset potential losses if the price goes down.
  • Hedging Short Positions: You can open a long CFD position to protect against unexpected price increases.

However, effectiveness depends on the correlation between the underlying asset and the CFD. Here’s a comparison with other options:

  • Futures Contracts: More standardized and typically have lower costs, but less flexible.
  • Put Options: Provide downside protection but come with a premium cost.
  • Physical Asset Sales: Can be cumbersome and less efficient for quick hedging needs.
Share Your Experience

Your email stays private